Monday, July 15, 2024
HomeBusinessApple says it didn't know Trump's DOJ was asking for Democrats' data

Apple says it didn’t know Trump’s DOJ was asking for Democrats’ data


Related stories

Utanmaz Türkler: Exploring Cultural Nuances and Societal Impacts

Introduction "Utanmaz Türkler" translates to "Shameless Turks" in English. This...

Why Trusts Are Key to Wealth Preservation

When it comes to preserving wealth across generations, few...

Gracie Bon: A Rising Star in the Fitness and Wellness Industry

Gracie Bon is a name that has been making...

Dimple Malhan- Personal and Professional life!!

Famous Vlogger recognised for Dimple's Kitchen YouTube channel. She...


Tim Cook, Chief Executive Officer of Apple, speaks as President Donald Trump listens during an American Technology Council roundtable in the State Dinning Room of the White House, Monday, June 19, 2017, in Washington.

Alex Brandon | AP

Apple said Friday it didn’t know former President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice was asking for the metadata of Democratic lawmakers when it complied with a subpoena seeking the information.

Apple’s admission that it complied with the DOJ’s request demonstrates the thorny position tech companies are placed in when forced to balance their customers’ private online activity with legitimate requests from law enforcement. In general, companies like Apple challenge such requests, but in this case a grand jury and federal judge forced Apple to comply and keep it quiet.

The admission follows a Thursday New York Times report that Trump’s DOJ seized at least a dozen records from people close to the House intelligence panel related to news reports on the former president’s contacts with Russia. At the time, the DOJ was looking for records from House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and committee member Eric Swalwell, D-Calif.

Apple said it received a subpoena from a federal grand jury on Feb. 6, 2018. According to Apple, the subpoena requested data that belonged to a seemingly random group of email addresses and phone numbers. Apple said it provided the identifiers it had for some of the requests from the DOJ, but not all of the requests were for Apple customers.

Because of a nondisclosure order signed by a federal magistrate judge, Apple could not notify the people that their data was subpoenaed. The so-called gag order lifted on May 5, which is why Apple only recently alerted the affected users. According to Apple, the subpoena did not provide details on the nature of the investigation.

See also  French COVID protest convoy defies Paris stay-away order By Reuters

Apple spokesperson Fred Sainz said in a statement that the company did not and could not have known who was being targeted by the request.

“We regularly challenge warrants, subpoenas and nondisclosure orders and have made it our policy to inform affected customers of governmental requests about them just as soon as possible,” Sainz said in the statement. “In this case, the subpoena, which was was issued by a federal grand jury and included a nondisclosure order signed by a federal magistrate judge, provided no information on the nature of the investigation and it would have been virtually impossible for Apple to understand the intent of the desired information without digging through users’ accounts. Consistent with the request, Apple limited the information it provided to account subscriber information and did not provide any content such as emails or pictures.”

Apple also said that due to the nature of the subpoena, it believed other tech companies received similar orders from the DOJ.

Microsoft on Friday told CNBC it received a similar subpoena from the DOJ.

“In 2017 Microsoft received a subpoena related to a personal email account,” a Microsoft spokesperson told CNBC. “As we’ve said before, we believe customers have a constitutional right to know when the government requests their email or documents, and we have a right to tell them. In this case, we were prevented from notifying the customer for more than two years because of a gag order. As soon as the gag order expired, we notified the customer who told us they were a congressional staffer. We then provided a briefing to the representative’s staff following that notice. We will continue to aggressively seek reform that imposes reasonable limits on government secrecy in cases like this.”

See also  COP26: Forward march! - The Financial Express

The DOJ’s watchdog is currently investigating the probe under Trump’s tenure.

Read more about the case here.


Source link

Bellie Brown
Bellie Brown
Hi my lovely readers, I am Bellie brown editor and writer of I write blogs on various niches such as business, technology, lifestyle., health, entertainment, etc as well as manage the daily reports of the website. I am very addicted to my work which makes me keen on reading and writing on the very latest and trending topics. One can check my more writings by visiting

Latest stories