20.8 C
London
Saturday, August 13, 2022
HomeBusinessBuckingham Palace must do better on diversity, royal source says By Reuters

Buckingham Palace must do better on diversity, royal source says By Reuters

Date:

Related stories

A Beginner’s Guide to Email Automation

Email automation is a great way to save time...

Switch from gas boosts oil demand, but economic headwinds loom — IEA

Speaking to CNBC on Monday, the executive director...

Some Journeys Can Be Only Travelled Alone!

Maybe you and your friends are unable to conclude...

The Impact of Unhealthy Business Practices in the NFL

The NFL has been in the news recently for...


3/3
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A guardsman walks outside Buckingham Palace in London, Britain April 13, 2021. REUTERS/John Sibley/File Photo

2/3

By Michael Holden

LONDON (Reuters) – Buckingham Palace, which has come under fire from Queen Elizabeth’s grandson Prince Harry and his wife Meghan for the way it deals with race, has not done enough to increase diversity among staff, a senior royal source has said.

In its annual report on the Sovereign Grant, which details the queen’s taxpayer-funded spending, the palace said on Wednesday that only 8.5% of its staff were from ethnic minorities, the first time it has given such a breakdown.

“We recognise we are not where we would like to be,” said the source, speaking on condition of anonymity.

“Her Majesty and members of the royal family have promoted and embrace the diversity of our nation and that of the Commonwealth, and we therefore recognise that our own workforce needs to reflect the communities that we serve. We haven’t made the progress that we would like, and we can do better.”

The palace says it aims to have 10% of staff from ethnic minorities by the end of 2022.

In an explosive U.S. interview with Oprah Winfrey in March, Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, accused an unnamed member of the royal family of a racist comment.

Harry’s elder brother William publicly denied that the family were racist, but the queen said the issue was concerning, and would be addressed.

In the run-up to the interview, the palace also said it would review staff allegations of bullying by Meghan, and she said she was saddened by the “attack on her character”.

Michael Stevens, the queen’s treasurer, told reporters at a briefing on the grant that the review was still in progress.

He also revealed that the queen’s finances had taken a hit from the COVID-19 pandemic.

The core grant of 51.5 million pounds ($72 million) is boosted by additional income, mainly from tickets to visit royal palaces. But this extra revenue fell by 53%, to 9.4 million pounds, because of the pandemic.

However, the drop was offset by savings, and by 2.4 million pounds from Harry and Meghan to cover the renovation of their British home, Frogmore Cottage, which had been paid for by the Sovereign Grant before they gave up their royal duties to move to the United States, and to meet rental costs.

“The payment covers all their current obligations,” Stevens said.

The pandemic did give the royals a chance to speed up a 10-year overhaul of Buckingham Palace, which is currently on schedule and within its 369-million-pound budget, Stevens said.

($1 = 0.7161 pounds)

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.





Source link

Latest stories