© Reuters. Staff members of Apple Daily and its publisher Next Digital pose with the final edition of Apple Daily at its headquarters in Hong Kong, China June 24, 2021. REUTERS/Tyrone Siu
By Sharon Abratique and Pak Yiu
HONG KONG (Reuters) -China’s foreign ministry on Friday rejected comments by U.S. President Joe Biden that the closure of Hong Kong’s Apple (NASDAQ:) Daily newspaper signaled intensifying repression by Beijing in the semi-autonomous city.
Biden said on Thursday Apple Daily’s demise was a “sad day for media freedom”. Other foreign officials also expressed concern that it represented a further stifling of freedoms in Hong Kong, a trade gateway and international financial center.
Apple Daily had been a thorn in Beijing’s side, mixing pro-democracy discourse with celebrity gossip and investigations of those in power. It was forced to end a 26-year run after authorities froze the company’s funds.
Its closure follows the imposition of a national security law on the former British colony last year in response to mass pro-democracy protests in 2019 – a move seen by critics as strengthening Beijing’s control on the former British colony.
Hundreds of loyal readers lined up at newsstands across the city to buy last editions.
“I hope reporters can stay true to their faith and keep working hard,” said Tse, 60, a former medical worker, as she queued for a paper.
Biden called on Beijing to stop targeting the independent press and to release detained journalists and media executives.
“People in Hong Kong have the right to freedom of the press. Instead, Beijing is denying basic liberties and assaulting Hong Kong’s autonomy and democratic institutions,” he said in a statement.
Apple Daily had been “a much-needed bastion of independent journalism in Hong Kong,” he said.
“Through arrests, threats, and forcing through a National Security Law that penalizes free speech, Beijing has insisted on wielding its power to suppress independent media and silence dissenting views,” he said, vowing continued U.S. support for the people of Hong Kong.
China’s foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian dismissed the criticism at a news conference in Beijing on Friday.
“The U.S. leader’s position is factually baseless,” Zhao said.
Officials in Hong Kong and China have repeatedly said media freedoms are respected but not absolute, and cannot endanger national security.
The shutdown deals the most serious blow yet to Hong Kong’s media freedoms and could potentially destroy the city’s reputation as a media hub, media advocacy groups say.
U.N. human rights chief Michelle Bachelet on Thursday criticised the detention of Apple Daily owner Jimmy Lai.
Speaking to the 2021 Society of Publishers in Asia press awards ceremony held in Hong Kong, Bachelet said the national security law was leading journalists to self-censor to avoid clashing with “vaguely formulated offences.”
Lai has been in jail since December over unauthorized rallies during the pro-democracy protests in 2019. He is facing three national security charges, including colluding with a foreign country and is already serving several sentences for taking part in unauthorized rallies.
British foreign minister Dominic Raab called on China to respect its commitments to free media under an agreement with Britain over how Hong Kong would be ruled after its return from British rule to China in 1997.
ONE MILLION COPIES
In anticipation of robust demand for its final print run, The Apple Daily printed one million copies, or more than 10 times its usual. Some Apple Daily staff expressed anger and frustration.
“(After) today, there is no press freedom in Hong Kong,” said Dickson Ng, 51, a designer at the paper. “I feel very disappointed and angry.”
Last week, 500 officers raided the newspaper’s headquarters, sifting through reporters’ notes and other material.
Five executives were arrested, and two – chief editor Ryan Law and Cheung Kim-hung – were charged with conspiracy to commit collusion with a foreign country and denied bail. On Wednesday, a columnist for the paper was also arrested under the national security law.